Summary/Abstract: Theoretical elaboration of guerrilla as a social conflict starts from several premises or questions and these are: does this form of conflict have a positive function towards the occupier or the internal system; does this external or internal social conflict has positive influence on inter-group cohesion; do these social conflicts result in strengthening of social bonds and positive social changes; do they have, in addition to class causes, some other class-independent grounds and causes: local-regional, ethnic-national, professional, confessional, ideological, political, philosophically oriented, moral and other. The answers to these questions entail a long-term and studious approach, which would lead to adequate contents and universal analyses, their motives, factors, causes and consequences. These efforts should be directed at more exactness that would sublime various empirical and quantitativestatistic researches. Since this paper has no such pretensions, and due to impossibility to give all proper answers to the questions of the real essence of guerrilla as a conflict, it maintains at the higher level of generalization.
