Istorijski časopis
Primary tabs
Историјски часопис, званично гласило Историјског института, излази од 1948. године. Објављује оригиналне научне радове на српском и другим језицима. Примењује систем „слепих“ рецензија два рецензента. Тематски оквир часописа обухвата економску, друштвену, политичку и културну историју српског народа, као и његове везе са јужнословенским и осталим балканским народима, и истовремено унапређује све гране историјске науке. Хронолошки оквир је омеђен на период од средњег века до почетка 20. века, односно до 1918. године и стварања Краљевине СХС.
Homepage
CEEOL
ISSN: 0350-0802
Pages
-
- The Port of Maurocastro, Emperor Theodore Svetoslav and the Tatar Elite in the Pontic Steppes
- The article is dedicated to the question of the disputed Bulgarian rule over the Black sea port of Maurocastro at the beginning of the fourteenth century. On the basis of relevant sources, it is concluded that Maurocastro was in Bulgarian hands during 1314–1316. It has been argued that the establishment of Bulgarian rule ensued as a consequence of internal dissensions in the lands of the Golden Horde that followed the accession of Khan Mohammad Uzbek. A focus is placed also on the relations between Emperor Theodore Svetoslav and influential Tatar nobles in the western parts of the Pontic Steppes. A new hypothesis is proposed with respect to the origin of empress Euphrosyne, the wife of Theodore Svetoslav.
-
- The Protestant Ethic — The Neglected Centre-Point in the Work of Max Weber
- The aim of this paper is that stated in its title: to explain some of the reasons why Max Weber’s ‘Protestant Ethic’ should be seen a central component in his work and thought, and not, as is currently the case, a text which receives much lip-service but is substantially ignored. One chief reason for the text’s neglect (Section I) lies in Weber’s ostentatious use of historical materials which appear remote to social scientists today. It should however be understood that the ‘Protestant Ethic’ is a statement about modernity from beginning to end – Weber is only using the past to make a statement about the present – while the allegedly “historical” criticisms of the text made by sociologists have no foundation, because they are made in ignorance of Weber’s historicist premisses. A principal component of Weber’s analysis of modernity is his interest in modern rationalism or rationality (Section II). Here it should be noted that while the ‘Protestant Ethic’ began as a statement about capitalism, it was then overlaid by a second, overlapping statement about rationality. This is extremely important, and we cannot understand Weber’s thinking on this subject by relying on later texts (such as ‘Economy and Society’) alone. Another major element of his modern thought, and one of the most neglected, is his thinking about ethics (Section III). Here – as its title suggests – the ‘Protestant Ethic’ is of unique importance. This paper draws on my book, Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic: Twin Histories (2014) but, especially in the first and third sections, goes beyond it, and constitutes an independent statement.
-
- The ‘Original’ and the ‘Revised’ Annales Regni Francorum
- The Annales regni Francorum are preserved in two recensions: the so-called ‘original’ and the ‘revised’ version. The aim of this article is to make a profound analysis of both versions and to establish which version is the’revised’and which one is the ‘original’.
-
- Titre de Trpimir selon les dires de Gottschalk
- Le passage qui se présente au coeur de nôtre étude, provenant des écrits de Gottschalk, découverts qu’en 1931, nous revèlent que les habitants de la Dalmatie qualifiaient Trpimir de roi, le fait qui est en contradiction avec la preuve que nous apporte le matériel épigraphique. En procédant par une analyse minutieuse de la pensée théologique de ce moine bénédictin, on essaiera d’éclairer ce passage qui a fait l’objet des polémiques multiples.
-
- Tома Бугон, которски властелин и трговац (14. век)
- According to the sources, literary works, as well as published and unpublished material from the Archives of Kotor and Dubrovnik, the life and work of Toma Bugon has been portrayed, representing a successful man of affairs, typical of maritime regions of the Late Middle Ages. Toma's successful commercial and credit affairs with his compatriots and nearest neighbours (above all inhabitants of Dubrovnik, merchants of Venice and other Italian towns) have been emphasized; investment of the acquired capital into developed commercial and credit affairs simultaneously, as well as into the real estate property (houses and lands) in Kotor and Serbia; familial circumstances and financial state. Successful commercial affairs and social respect this prominent merchant of Kotor enjoyed have served as a basis for the study of the social and economic history of Kotor of the first half of 14th century.
-
- Јеврем Обреновић – скица једне политичке каријере –
- Jevrem Obrenovic, known as Gospodar Jevrem /Master Jevrem/ (Srednja Dobrinja 18.3.1790 – Manasija, Valachia 21.9.1856), the youngest brother of Prince Milos, the Prince Regent in 1835 (during the stay of Prince Milos in Constantinople) and in 1839-1840 (from the abdicationof Prince Milos due to the sickness of Prince Milan to the return to the country of Prince Mihailo), president of the State Council 1838-1842, and honorary member of the Serbian Scientific Society. He had been one of the most significant and most interesting figure of the political and cultural scene of Serbia in the first half of the 19th century. The Second Serbian Uprising in 1815 he had spent as a hostage in chains in the Kalemegdan Fort, from 1816 to 1831 he lived in Sabac as the District Prince of the Sabac, Valjevo and Soko District, and from 1831 to 1842, when his political career ended, he had been the governor of the Belgrade town and district. Both in Sabac and Belgrade he had built nice buildings and his home, where he lived in a noble “European” way, became a place of gathering for writers and artists. He had been one of the greatest patron of art of his times in Serbia. During these years however, it was observed that Jevrem had great difficulties in accepting his brother’s tutorship, and their relations particularly worsened in 1837 when Prince Milos objected to the marriage of his niece Anka to the Austrian consul Antun Mihanovic. Jevrem then resigned to all of his functions, requested a passport for himself and his whole family and left Serbia. He returned by the end of the same year with a group of members of the opposition, former officials of the administration, with a desire to influence directly the political events and the Prince to change his way of rule. Thus he became one of the pillars of the opposition movement. At the beginning of 1839, when the Constitution was proclaimed (based upon the Sultan’s decree issued by the end of 1838 in Constantinople), he was confirmed as the president of the State Council, a body that Prince Milos had to share the supreme power with and why he abdicated in June of the same year. During the reign of Prince Mihailo (1839-1842) he understood that he was used by the constitutionalists as an instrument only in the struggle against absolutism, and that he was subjected to the same treatment as the rest of the Obrenovic family. During the Vucic rebellion (1842) he was expelled from the country and had been never able to return.
-
- Један непознати извор о предаји градова Хрвоја Вукчића Хрватинића угарском краљу Жигмунду 1410. године
- This paper, based on a formerly unknown document from the Hungarian State Archives in Budapest, broadens the information on the surrender of four towns/fortresses in the middle Drina valley and southern Usora, which belonged to Hrvoje Vukčić (Srebrenica, Kučlat, Sused and Brodar), to Hungarian King Sigismund of Luxemburg in the spring of 1410. Hungarian garrisons, with Hrvoje’s consent, took over the towns from their warden Raup (Rauf), a man from the village of Vrde in župa Livno. Due to this and his other merits for the benefit of King Sigismund, Raup was awarded the royal town (marketplace) of Paližna (Palešnik) in the County of Križevci in Slavonia. Furthermore, Raup, his wife, children and their relative Grgur of Uskoplje gained numerous neighbouring villages as the hereditary possessions. Raup’s heirs were mentioned on these possessions at least from 1425 until 1482, according to currently available sources. The paper also discusses the issue of Raup’s identification, i.e. whether Raup of Livno and Raup, twice listed as Raup Dragović/Dragovoljić from Sana, a servant of Hrvoje Vukčić from the period 1399–1405, are identical personalities. Although we lack explicit confirmation for such a theory, the unusual name and positions that the afore-mentioned person held in Hrvoje’s environment suggests that all the mentions of Raup refer to the one and the same person.
-
- Један поглед на ратове Дубровника
- L’article est consacré à l’étude des guerres ragusaines depuis la fin du 12ème siècle, jusqu’ au milieu du 15ème siècle. L’auteur distingue trois grandes périodes dans le déroulement des guerres ragusaines. La première entre la fin du 12ème et le début du 14ème siècle, et qui concerne les guerres contre les souverains serbes de la dynastie némanide, la deuxième qui concerne la seconde moitié 14ème siècle, consacrée aux conflits, dans le cadre des grandes coalitions maritimes de Venise et de Gênes, et la troisième qui comprend les guerres contre les rois et seigneurs de Bosnie, au 15ème siècle. Toutes ces guerres ont leurs caractéristiques propres, que l’auteur s’efforce de dégager et d’analyser. Une attention particulière est consacrée au recrutement des mercenaires étrangers, italiens en premier lieu, dans les guerres de Dubrovnik. L’attention est attirée sur le fait que les mercenaires au service de Dubrovnik bénéficient de moins d’autonomie, dans la conduite des opérations militaires, que leurs homologues au service de Venise, et qu’ils sont constamment sous le contrôle des patriciens locaux. Les mercenaires étrangers toutefois s’aperçoivent parfois des compétences plutôt limitées des Ragusains dans la direction des affaires militaires : ceuxci se font d’ailleurs, plusieurs fois écraser au 15ème siècle par leurs ennemis, notamment par les ducs Radoslav Pavlović et Stefan-Vukčić-Kosača.
-
- Једна хипотеза о пореклу великог жупана Уроша I
- The dinasty, which ruled Serbia during the first half of the XIIth century, emerged around 1082/1083 when Bodin, king of Dioclea, conquered Serbia and sent two zoupans from his court, Vukan and Marco, to establish a new dinasty. The region which came under the rule of Marco was situated, most probably, in the areas of modern northern Serbia as well as Bosnia, south of the Sava river. Therefore, his northern neighbours were Hungarians. It is quite indicative that personal name Uroš comes from the Hungarian root ur - meaning princeps or dominus, and allows conclusion that Marco was married with the unknown Hungarian women, probably of noble stock. It is also assumed that the sons of Marco were Uroš and Stephen Vukan, the same persons mentioned at Byzantine princess Anne Comnene in 1094 as the nethews of grand zoupan Vukan. It is also assumed that comes Marco, signed on two charters of Hungarian king Coloman 1111 and 1124 is the same person who was the father of Stephen Vukan and Uroš, and whose name is missing on the another charter of king Coloman dated in 1113 among the comes's who are usually subscribed on royal charters. According to this identification of comes Marco and zoupan Marco, father of Stephen Vukan and Uroš, it is concluded that Uroš overthroned legitimate heir of grand zoupan Vukan, Zavida, with the help pf his father and his Hungarian ally
-
- Јоаникије, митрополит рашко-призренски
- Metropolitan Joanikije was born in 1731 in Tulež in central Serbia. His life before the ascent to episcopal rank is scarcely known, but it is certain that he became a monk as a young man. It is not possible to determine precisely to which monastery he belonged, but his links with Studenica, as well as the links of his close relatives with the same monastery, are suggesting that he could have become a monk in it. As a monk, he received a good education and learned Greek, probably while staying for some time in the areas inhabited by the Greeks. He became a bishop between 1766 and 1779, when he was appointed vicar bishop of the Dabro-bosanska metropolis. He became the Metropolitan of Prizren in 1780 or 1781, and of Raška in 1784. He administered both dioceses from 1790, which was confirmed by sultan’s decree in 1808. As a bishop, he was endowed by diplomatic skill and patience. In his contacts with the central government, he succeeded to protect the rights of his Orthodox Christians, but also to maintain good relationship with Muslims. He died in Prizren, on November 26th 1818.
-
- ЉУБИЧИЦЕ, И ЈА БИХ ТЕ БРАЛА...”. „ЖЕНСКО ДРУШТВО” У ДНЕВНИКУ ТОШКА ВЛАХОВИЋА
- Toško Vlahović was a student of philosophy at the universities of St. Petersburg and Jena, the Chetnik duke and the commander of the detachment of Krajina in the Serbian resistance movement and Toplica uprising. In his war diary, he recorded impressions of the female part of the population of the Kingdom of Serbia during the occupation in the Great War (1915–1918). For members of the tenderer sex, girls and women, Vojvoda Vlahović used the term “ženske” which was then used in everyday life. The occupied Serbian society, which was to a certain extent divided, is presented realistically. Women and girls provided help and support to participants in the resistance movement and rebels, but there was also a small number of “chicks” who collaborated with the Bulgarian occupying authorities. This cooperation was reflected in the informative activities, i.e. reporting of compatriots for various “violations”. Vlahović witnessed the massive suffering of the civilian population during the criminal expedition of the troops of the Central Powers, which followed the breakup of the uprising movement. In the diary he recorded the pain and suffering of girls, women (younger, middleaged, and elderly). Women were victims of abuse of Bulgarian soldiers and komitadji. But, sometimes, members of the Serbian resistance movement were also abusers. Women were raped, beaten, mistreated, sometimes killed. Toško Vlahović’s notebooks were written in difficult times, when the imperative was to survive. Life turned into a continuous and merciless struggle for the preservation of bare existence. In this fight, at times, the “goals”, “patriotism”, “the fatherland” were forgotten... This makes this historical source valuable. The diary is accurate, realistic, picturesque. The author, using the richness of the examples of the “deviations from the rule”, illustratively presents the dark and bright side of the life of the “Women’s Society” during the occupation.