Mešovita građa
Primary tabs
Историјски институт основан је 15. јула 1947. године са задатком да изучава економску, друштвену, политичку, и културну историју српског народа, као и његове везе са јужнословенским и осталим балканским народима, и да истовремено унапређује све гране историјске науке. За првог управника Института именован је др Виктор Новак, а за заменика управника др Георгије Острогорски. До 25. марта 1961. године Институт се налазио у саставу Српске академије наука и уметности када је одлуком Извршног већа НР Србије проглашен за самосталну научну установу. Решењем Републичке заједнице за научни рад Историјски институт је 28. септембра 1971. године стекао статус научног института.
Редакцијa Mешовитe грађe (miscellanea):
др Радомир J. Поповић (Одговорни уредник),
др Биљана Стојић, (Историјски институт Београд)
др Михаил Белов (Институт међународних односа и светске историје Универзитета Н.И.Лобачевскиј, Нижниј Новгород)
др Дејан Булић, (Историјски институт Београд)
др Гордана Гарић Петровић, (Историјски институт Београд)
др Милош Ивановић, (Историјски институт Београд)
проф. др Андреа Картени (Сапиенца Унивезитет, Рим)
др Урош Татић, (Историјски институт Београд)
проф. др Људмила Кузмичева (Историјски факултет Универзитета Ломоносов, Москва)
проф. др Gabriella Schubert (Институт за славистику Универзитета у Јени)
проф. д.и.н. Лилиана Симеонова (Балканолошки институт БАН)
Pages
-
- Пројект Устава Србије Матије Бана из 1846. године
- Summary/Abstract: Matija Ban (Petrovo selo, Dubrovnik, 1818 - Belgrade, 1903), an eminentwriter and national worker, compiled The Project of the Serbian Constitution in the fall of 1846. It was supposed to correct the deficiencies in the Constitution of 1838, to strengthen the autonomy of Serbia and expand the ruling powers of Prince Aleksandar Karadjordjevic, for whose purposes the project was written. With the Project of the Constitution, there are two related documents: Primječanija and Pobudjenja in which Ban outlined the motives by which he was guided in the work of drafting the constitution. The Project of the Constitution is divided into six chapters: the Political Rights of the Principality of Serbia, Civil Rights of the Serbs, Central Government, on the Authority of the Principality, on the State Council, on the State Council (Sovjet zemaljski) and has a total of 64 articles. As for the autonomous rights of the Principality of Serbia, Ban’s starting point is respect of the Turkish public acts (Sultan’s edicts, firman, berat) on which this autonomy is organized (hereditary princely dignity, the amount of tribute, state symbols, the position of the church, keeping the army ...). By his project, civil rights of the Serbs are guaranteed, while most changes in relation to the Constitution from 1838 were in the organization of the central government. In addition to a provided hereditary princely dignity, Prince had broad powers to the executive and legislative authorities (appoints and dismisses ministers, has a legislative initiative, manages foreign policy, commands the army ...). The State Council (Zemaljski savet) of ten members is exclusively legislative authority, and a new item is the establishment of the State Council, composed of six or eight members, which had an advisory and supervisory function. Strengthening the authority of the principality by the new constitution, Ban endeavoured to strengthen the disturbed autonomy of Serbia.
-
- РАД СРПСКОГ ПОЉОПРИВРЕДНОГ ДРУШТВА У ИЗБЕГЛИШТВУ (26. децембар 1916/8. јануар 1917 – 1/14. фебруар 1918)
- Summary/Abstract: The paper analyses the meetings of the Serbian Agricultural Society held in exile during the First World War. The first gathering of the Society’s members was held on 26 December 1916 in Thessaloniki, when the temporary administration was elected. Until February 1918, the temporary Governing Board held 16 meetings. The aim of the Serbian Agricultural Society during this period was to make preparations for the restoration of agriculture in Serbia after the war.
-
- Распис о школским каштигама из 1870. године
- Summary/Abstract: Corporal punishment, as a traditional and well known instrument of power in hands of European state authority, was also popular and commonly used in a new Serbian state of 19 Century. As simple, practical and useful method of discipline system, it was widely applied. From the courtyards of police headquarters to the jails and convict camps, even in a rooms of elementary school, corporal punishment was cheap, efficient and obvious way to reinforce a structure of power and to remind who is in charge. The document published here is an official order from year 1870, of a Serbian Minister of education and religious affairs, establishing a thorough method of punishment, which school teachers can and should use to discipline their pupils. Being elaborate and based on strong moral beliefs, this order reviles a strange mixture of humanity and cold bureaucratic reasons that SerbianMinister of education express. In the same time he was trying to protect pupils from arbitrary and malevolent acts of their teachers, and on the other hand he is convinced that extreme measures against “shameless” and “corrupted” children are morally justified.
-
- Распоред учитеља у Рашко-призренској епархији за 1905/06. школску годину
- Summary/Abstract: The circumstances concerning education among the Serbs in the Old Serbia and in general in the territories under Turkish rule in the early 20th century, reflected political situation in the region. The status of Serb teachers in the Raška-Prizren Eparchy was of particular importance, both for the Serb population who lived there, and for the Serbian government in Belgrade. The interests of Serbia, Turkey, Universal Patriarchy and Metropolitans that belonged to it, all intersected through the educational cadres in the Old Serbia. Through the control of the education personnel, Turkey attempted to suppress national aspirations of Serbs under her rule; Serbia anted to have insight into the state of affairs of the Serb people, and the easiest way to do it was through people who worked in education; by controlling teachers, the Metropolitan Niciphor, as the Archpriest in charge, wanted to be the main representative of the Serbs from this part of the Old Serbia.Apart from general administrative functions, lists with the allocation of teachers also reflected these interests. The enclosed list provides the allocation of teachers in the Raška- Prizren Eparchy in the 1905/6 school year, as well as of the one preceding it. These lists are important, for they provide a wealth of information about the education personnel, as well as about the education circumstances among the Serbs in Old Serbia in general. They contain the name and surname of the teacher, place and date of birth, school qualifications, degree, and the previous post. This enables us to follow the developmental trajectory of teachers, numbers of schools and teachers in them, and places where teachers came from. Based on the allocation of teachers, one could see that the educational policy of the Kingdom of Serbia started to bear fruit. There were schools in 95 settlements in the Raška-Prizren Eparchy, and 173 teachers in them, 30 of whom were women. Most teachers, as well as students, were in the places were schools existed for longer period of time. Another success of the right policy is seen from the fact that most of the personnel were from the Old Serbia, and completed their education there. The list also reflects which schools the teachers graduated from, and that the educational cadre in the Raška-Prizren Eparchy was educationally competent for the job they performed.
-
- Ратни пут војног свештеника. Светозар Ивошевић у Првом светском рату
- Summary/Abstract: In this article the author provides an analysis of the wartime career of Serbian Army chaplain Svetozar Ivošević. Serbian Army chaplains were commissioned officers in military units and hospitals. Chaplains provided soldiers with spiritual support and had an important role in moral guidance through formal teaching, counsel, and personal example. Ivošević’s wartime career was full of events and personalities, and he was a man of extraordinary energy. Based on the order of 12 October 1915, he was appointed military chaplain in the 5th Infantry Regiment Combined Division. After Serbian Army’s retreat through the Albanian mountains, his regiment arrived at the island of Corfu on 20 February 1916. According to the chaplains’ schedule of 27 March 1916, he was appointed a military chaplain in the 12th Infantry Regiment Šumadija Division. After the reorganization of the Serbian Army, Ivošević was enlisted as a military chaplain of the 24th Infantry Regiment Vardar Division. From the island of Corfu Ivošević went to the Thessaloniki Front on 11 May 1916. Due to a conflict with the deputy regiment commander, in March 1917 he was accused of selling bread to soldiers. In September 1917 he was awarded the Gold Medal for valuable service in the same regiment. On 9 June 1917 Svetozar Ivošević was appointed a military chaplain in the British General Hospital No 2 located in Sorović. The article includes the findings based on the unpublished diary written by Svetozar Ivošević, published legal documents and corresponding bibliography. The war diary of military chaplain Ivošević presents a reconstruction of his life, but also provides an insight into the activities of other chaplains, officers and soldiers during the First World War. Ivošević recorded in detail the events from 23 October 1915 to the last day of the war, 11 November 1918.
-
- Рађање модерне Трепче
- Summary/Abstract: It is well-known that the northern part of Kosovo and Metohija has always been rich with enormous deposits of ores, whose exploitation was carried out since the Roman era. However, the biggest mining activity in this area was recorded in the Middle Ages, during the Serbian dynasty of Nemanjić, whose state witnessed great economic prosperity due to mining. The mine and place of this oldest medieval mining area was Trepča. Trepča contains enormous quantities of lead and zinc ore. It covers the western, south-western and southern parts of Kopaonik and is one of the largest mines in Europe. The exploitation of its ore treasures started in the period of King Milutin (1282–1321), at the beginning of the 14th century and lasted until the Great Turkish War (1683–1699), after which it was abandoned, after over four centuries of constant work. For more than 200 years Trepča’s mines were deserted, with no miners and their tools. It was exposed to the ravages of time, until the liberation of these areas after the First Balkan War. The First World War did not allow for the examination of its layers of ores and a new start of its exploitation, but after the war, this issue was devoted serious attention. Several teams of experts were hired to examine the layers of ores in this area. One of these teams was hired by the concession owner’s son for the exploitation of Trepča, Radomir Pašić, along with Zagreb’s geologist Fran Tućan, for the sake of getting the estimates of the true value of concessions, which were owned by Pašić’s father. The research of this team confirmed that Trepča was rich with silver, gold, lead, zinc and copper ores. A well-known mining and metallurgical engineer Julius Draškoci drew attention about this to the British company Selection Trust LTD, which quickly reacted and sent to the field a group of experts with the mission to confirm the veracity of Draškoci’s information. Draškoci was telling the truth. The British decided to buy the concession from Radomir Pašić, sending him a lucrative offer, which he accepted. On 14 December 1925 a contract was officially signed in Belgrade about giving the rights to concession between Radomir Pašić on the one hand and John Archer Dune on the other, in the presence of British Vice-Consul Blakeney. The facsimile of this, so far unpublished document, was stored in the Yugoslav Archives, in the fund of legation of the Kingdom of SCS/Yugoslavia in London.
-
- Резолуција цара Карла VI из 1720. године
- Summary/Abstract: In 1720 Emperor Charles VI of Habsburg announced the Resolution as the response to complains and petitions of the Serb People and the Church Council, held in 1718. This Resolution contains 22 items, divided into two parts. The first part deals mostly with the problems of population in Slavonia and Srem, such as high taxes and labor obligations, abuses of Empire officials and officers, harassment committed by imperial troops. The second part refers on the disrespect of rights and privileges of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Monarchy (freedom of religion, freedom from paying church taxes to the Catholic Church, right to Church incomes). The Resolution of Emperor Charles VI, issued in 1720, is preserved in translation into Serbian language of that time, and it is kept in the Archive of the Serbian Academy of Science and Arts, in Sremski Karlovci. The resolution provides valuable information about problems of Serbs and the Orthodox Church in Habsburg Monarchy after the Habsburg-Ottoman war (1716-1718).
-
- Реферат Јована Јовановића о односу Србије према реформској акцији у Солунском, Битољском и Косовском вилајету
- Summary/Abstract: Expertise of Jovan Jovanovic Pizon, who was charged in consular affairs in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Serbia, which has written in 1904, is valuable document about Serbian state course in provinces of three Turkish European vilayets, which she has regarded as her national and ethnic territories. This paper which was consist of fifty eight pages ougth to obliged Serbian government and her diplomatic representatives in Turkey, and in all the Balkan states to lead clear policy and in the same time to find solution how to protect all rights of Serbian population which were jeopardized in large scope, by the Turkish authorities as well as paramilitary Albanian forces. Paper of Jovan Jovanovic is consist of three chapters. The first and second are given review of the genesis of the Macedonian question from 1878 until 1903, while the third analyze Murtzeg program. The basic idea of Jovanovic was exercise of complete reform action in the three European vilayets. The result of that would be pacifications of the Albanians as well as conveying of the justice in rebellion provinces. New Serbian strategy should respect status quo as sign of good will towards Russia and Austro-Hungary. Jovanovic also in his paper has blamed Turkish government for sistematic opstruction of the Murtzeg plan and all other reform programs for Macedonia. At the same time he has condemned Bulgaria because she has avoid to negotiate with the Balkan states about common action toward Turkey. As for carrying out of the reforms he has pointed out bad conditions of the Christian population in Macedonia, and general conditions are not improved.
-
- Ростислав Фадејев о руско-српској савезничкој акцији ратне 1877. године
- Summary/Abstract: The letter of Rostislav Andreyevich Fadeyev sent to Illarion Ivanovich Vorontsov on 12/24 September 1877 in Bucharest is valuable for the following reasons: 1) the possibility of Serbo-Russian actions against Turkey in 1877/78; 2) the background and consequences of the visit of Prince Milan Obrenović to Tsar Alexander II in Ploiesti in June 1877; 3) divided views in terms of alliance with Serbia in the Russian civilian and military circles, but also within various military instances; 4) Serbia’s delay in renewing the war against Turkey by December 1877. Fadeyev, like the Grand Duke Nikolai Nikolaevich, chief commander of the Danube Army, considered that Gorchakov for the sake of an agreement with Austria-Hungary unjustifiably dismissed Serbs, who were necessary and useful in the Russian struggle against the Turks. Already in August 1877, he had solid evidence for it, when the Russian offensive stopped for several months (July–December 1877) at Plevna – the Turkish fortress immediately after the Romanian border, near Nikopol. That event activated plans for joint Serbian-Russian actions and realism with delay, after Serbia declared war on Turkey, on 13 December 1877.